Reliability of radiocarbon dating

While there is no proof that the rates were different in the past than they are today, there is also no proof that they were the same.

Scientists place great faith in this dating method, and yet more than 50% of radiocarbon dates from geological and archaeological samples of northeastern North America have been deemed unacceptable after investigation.

Carbon-14 comes from nitrogen and is independent of the carbon-12 reservoir.

This assumption is backed by numerous scientific studies and is relatively sound.

However, conditions may have been different in the past and could have influenced the rate of decay or formation of radioactive elements.

You can help Amazing Discoveries reduce costs by upgrading or replacing your internet browser with one of the options below.

Search for reliability of radiocarbon dating:

reliability of radiocarbon dating-53reliability of radiocarbon dating-48reliability of radiocarbon dating-6

We thank you in advance for partnering with us in this small but significant way. All methods of radioactive dating rely on three assumptions that may not necessarily be true: It is assumed that the rate of decay has remained constant over time.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

One thought on “reliability of radiocarbon dating”

  1. Slouch­ing, fid­get­ing, dart­ing eyes, shift­ing weight from one leg to the other, folded arms and hands hid­den in pock­ets are just some of the tell­tale signs of a lack of con­fi­dence.